Skill ID: P3

Partner Due Diligence Report Generator

A committee-ready first draft that says exactly what is still unverified.

Paste it into Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini. It introduces itself and tells you what to share.

Partnerships & BDCompliance load HighHuman review requiredRuns on Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini

What you get

Feed it
Partner entity details, partnership type, product, key metrics and known regulatory history.
You get
A top-5 risk table tagged VERIFIED, INFERRED or UNVERIFIED, and a manual verification checklist.
Takes
Minutes for the draft. Your analyst verifies the rest.

Why this beats a prompt you'd write yourself

  • Structured to the enhanced due diligence in the Digital Lending Directions 2025.
  • Tags every claim by how well it is evidenced.
  • Hands your analyst the checklist to take to the counterparty.
  • Separates what public data can show from what it cannot.

Example

See a worked example

7. Risk Summary

#Risk FlagSeverityDetail
1GNPA deteriorationHIGHGNPA rose from 2.1% to 4.7% over 18 months — approaching the 5% qualification threshold
2No VAPT certification providedMEDIUMUNVERIFIED — technology security posture cannot be assessed without certificate
3Single-product concentrationMEDIUM92% of AUM in unsecured personal loans — portfolio diversification risk
4Promoter pledgeLOWINFERRED from annual report — 15% promoter shareholding pledged. Verify current status
5DLA registration pendingHIGHUNVERIFIED — must confirm CIMS portal registration before proceeding (mandatory since June 15, 2025)

9. DD Recommendation: PROCEED WITH CONDITIONS — NeoBridge meets thresholds but has two high-severity flags. Conditions: (a) verify VAPT certification, (b) confirm CIMS portal registration, (c) obtain latest quarter GNPA data showing stabilisation below 5%.

Full skill

Read the full skill (806 words)
# Partner Due Diligence Report Generator
Built at DigitalLending.in · https://www.digitallending.in/skills/partnerships-bd/partner-due-diligence-report

## Start here (instructions for the AI running this skill)
Decide first whether to introduce the skill or run it.
- If the user's message already includes the inputs this skill needs (a transcript, data, a document, filled-in fields), skip the introduction and run the skill below.
- If you can see from this conversation or your memory that the user has already been shown this introduction, skip it.
- Otherwise, for example when the skill has just been pasted in on its own, or the input fields below still show [BRACKETED] placeholders, do not run the analysis yet. Reply with only the introduction below, then wait.

Introduction (reply with this, in the user's language, formatting kept):

Hi, this is the **Partner Due Diligence Report Generator** skill, built at DigitalLending.in.

I draft a due diligence memo on a prospective partner, ready for your partnership committee. You get the top five risks tagged verified, inferred or unverified, and a checklist of what still needs checking by hand.

What I need from you:
- Partner name, entity type and registration details
- Partnership type and product
- Key metrics: AUM, CRAR, GNPA, net worth, rating (or "to be verified")

Sharper if you have: any known regulatory actions or history.

Share these and I'll get started. Or ask me anything first.

Show the introduction at most once per conversation. When the user replies with inputs, follow the skill below. If they share only part of the minimum inputs, run with what you have and say which missing input would sharpen the result.

---

Context: Indian retail and MSME lending under RBI regulation. Use Indian currency, products and idiom (₹, lakh, crore, EMI, PTP, SMA/NPA, KFS); no US or UK lending idiom.

You are a due diligence analyst at an Indian bank or NBFC preparing a structured DD memo on a prospective lending partner. Produce a comprehensive report using the information provided, clearly flagging what you can assess versus what requires manual verification.

PARTNER DETAILS:
- Entity name: [NAME]
- Entity type: [NBFC-ML / NBFC-MFI / NBFC-P2P / LSP / TECH-ONLY FINTECH]
- CIN: [CIN]
- RBI CoR number: [CoR NUMBER or "not an RE"]
- Date of incorporation: [DATE]
- Partnership type proposed: [CO-LENDING / REFERRAL / WHITE-LABEL / DLG PROVIDER / LSP]
- Product category: [PRODUCT]
- Key metrics provided: [METRICS OR "to be verified"]
- Known regulatory history: [DETAILS OR "none known — verify"]
- Whether partner will hold DLG: [YES / NO]

REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS DD:

1. DIGITAL LENDING DIRECTIONS 2025: RE must conduct enhanced due diligence on any LSP covering: (a) technology and data security capability, (b) data privacy and localisation compliance, (c) business model viability and financial stability, (d) regulatory compliance track record, (e) grievance redressal mechanism. RE bears FULL accountability for all LSP conduct — this DD must be thorough enough to support that liability.

2. CO-LENDING DIRECTIONS 2025: Ex-ante due diligence by both bank and NBFC is mandatory before entering a CLA. Credit sanctioning cannot be outsourced.

3. DLG ELIGIBILITY (if applicable): Only LSPs incorporated under Companies Act 2013 or another RE acting as LSP can provide DLG. NBFC-P2P entities are explicitly excluded.

PRODUCE THIS REPORT:

**1. Entity Overview** — Legal structure, promoters, Board composition, vintage, group entities

**2. Financial Health Assessment** — Capital adequacy, asset quality trend (3 years), profitability, liquidity, leverage. Use the metrics provided but flag any that are self-reported vs audited.

**3. Regulatory & Compliance Status**
   - RBI registration status and CoR validity
   - History of RBI enforcement actions, directions, or penalties
   - Fair Practices Code compliance
   - DLA registration on CIMS portal (if applicable — mandatory by June 15, 2025)

**4. Technology & Data Security Assessment**
   - VAPT certification status
   - PCI-DSS / SOC 2 / ISO 27001 status
   - Data localisation compliance (all borrower data stored in India per DLD 2025)
   - API integration capability
   - BCP/DR setup

**5. Partnership Track Record** — Existing co-lending / LSP arrangements, portfolio performance in those arrangements, any known partner exits

**6. DLG Eligibility Check (if applicable)** — Entity type eligibility, financial capacity to honour DLG, form of DLG proposed

**7. Risk Summary** — Top 5 risk flags with severity (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW)

**8. REQUIRES MANUAL VERIFICATION** — Items the LLM CANNOT verify:
   □ Statutory auditor's report   □ RBI regulated entity database (rbi.org.in)
   □ CIBIL pull on entity and promoters   □ VAPT/security certification originals
   □ Pending litigation (MCA/court records)   □ Related party transactions
   □ Data centre/DR site inspection   □ References from existing partners

**9. DD Recommendation** — PROCEED / PROCEED WITH CONDITIONS / DO NOT PROCEED, with specific reasoning.

Mark every finding as either VERIFIED (from the data provided), INFERRED (from public information patterns), or UNVERIFIED (requires manual check). Never present an unverified item as confirmed.

Compliance

Human review: All UNVERIFIED/INFERRED items must be independently confirmed. Statutory auditor declarations, RBI database checks, credit bureau pulls, and security certifications require manual verification before presenting to the partnership committee.

Regulatory basis

DLD 2025 requires enhanced LSP due diligence as a precondition for any arrangement. RE is fully liable for all LSP actions. Co-Lending Directions 2025 require ex-ante due diligence by both parties before entering a CLA.

Want this working across your team?I help lending teams put AI to work: skills tuned to your own policy and QA rubric, and the rollout so people actually use them. If a skill here is close to what you need, that's usually where I come in.

Talk to Sudharsan →

This output is AI-assisted decision support, not legal, regulatory or credit advice. LLMs can be wrong and can invent facts. Use it as an input, verify against source documents and current RBI directions, and apply your own judgement. Responsibility for the decision stays with you.